HUDO Centre Prosecutor’s Response (answer): o o o o o o I did not read through their objectives. I did not see his visa and there is no war between Sudan and Czech. The defendant was not there in 2011 but he visited in 2012. Yes the laptop was with NISS and they brought it in March (after three months). I do not know if the burnt student’s photo is available on the internet. The defendant did not mention that he is working with POM. Yes, the receipt approves that the donation is personal. o The plea taking was in English and I was not in attendance. I brought the translator and the defendant accepted. o I did not make voice comparison. Yes the voice can be modified technically. o This is not the same camera but this very one was used in photographing the burnt student. Some questions of 2nd & 4th defendants’ lawyer:        The defendants are pastors at Sudanese Christ church, were they arrested by the complainant before opening the case or after? Nine pastors attended Addis Ababa conference including the accused (two), did you carry out investigations about the other seven? In the mentioned conference, presentations of many activities were showcased by different churches. Apart from religious activities they presented humanitarian activities carried out like water filters for communities which benefit Muslims and Christians. Did you investigate on the demolished churches? Do you know that the photo of the burnt student was displayed in Sudanese court on 2015? Many institutions contributed in treating the burnt student. Institutions like ALZAKA (Muslim religious tax) and the second defendant contributed many times. Do you know that the photos which were taken by the 1st defendant were intended to be presented to doctors for the purpose of assisting/ treating the student? The burnt student was detained by NISS together with the third defendant on 18th De. 2015 and later released? The accusation witness Telal was also detained on 18th Dec. 2015 and the other witnesses were members in NISS. Why did you accept to investigate with them while you ignored to investigate the pastors who attended the conference? The lawyer submitted the demolition notice of Taiba Alahamda church (the subject church) which was issued by the ministry of Urban Planning. Prosecutor’s Response (answer): o Yes, I know they are pastors but, I do not know that they were arrested by the complainant before or after opening the case. o I did not investigate with the other pastors. o I did not investigate on the humanitarian activity of the church. Yes the 2 nd and 3rd defendants presented the water filter and training people on filtering water. o I did not investigate on the demolished churches.