HUDO Centre o There was no resolution or declaration neither issued to expel/banish individuals that NISS announced at court nor was there any case opened against them. At 03:30 pm the judge adjourned court to 5th December 2016 for the accusing panel to question the complainant further. Notes;    During cross examination, some questions were rejected or could not be answered because it was considered to be part of the national security. NISS ignored the criminal procedure law under justification of the national security law allowing them. In some cases the accusing panel objected answering some of the questions though the complainant insisted on answering. Recommendations/ Appeal HUDO urges all the concerned, especially:     The Sudan court to conduct this trial fairly. The diplomatic missions and embassies to continue attending the court sessions. The activists and defendants’ supporters to keep on attending the trial though court has reached the stage of approving or rejecting the accusations. The Sudan and international media to give more coverage for the court. End For any further information please write to (hudo2009@gmail.com