Case No. (4086) defendant/ Musa Jahalla Ando The court listened to four defense witnesses. Case No.(4523/2011) defendants/ Elsir Aamir Elzaki & Abdalla Elzain Ragab The court listened to one of the defense witnesses. 31st July 2013. The court postponed the day sessions to 1st of August 2013. 1st August 2013 Case No.(4523/2011) defendants/Elsir Aamir Elzaki & Abdalla Elzain Ragab The court listened to two defense witnesses, and then the defense panel closed its defense file. Case No. (4086/2011) defendant/ Musa Jahalla Ando The court listened to two defense witnesses, and then the defense panel closed its defense file. Case No. (4325/2011) defendants (THE SIX) The court listened to three defense witnesses, two defending for (Ali Idriss) and one for (Sadam Abass John). The defense panel submitted to the court a request to give more time for the remained defense witnesses to make them able attending for their testimony, but the court reject the request and closed the defense file. The court declared 19th August 2013 for submitting the pleadings. The court declared 27th August 2013 for judicial charge sentences, in all cases. Important Notes: • The six defendants' names are, Sadam Abass John / Ali Idriss / Elnour Jackin Jackouni / Ali Tugul Bulaad / Hassan Suliman Mussa / Nabeil Taha Amir • The court rejected the request of asking more time to defense witnesses which submitted by the defense panel, because the judge leaned on article (18/B) Terrorism Combating Courts Procedure Rule (TCCPR), and also he leaned on article (21) of the same rule in preventing the appeal to go through except after the judicial sentences declared. Knowing that the defense panel has twenty four defense witnesses were excluded. • The Terrorism Combating Courts Procedure Rule, it is rules of court issued by head of judiciary under number (82) on year 2008. It used before on Omdurman JEM incidents (LONG ARM), which assist the court to charged most of the defendants by death sentences. This rules of court immediately after issued a group of activist lawyers objected and