HUDO Centre o I do not know whether the photos were displayed in court or not. o Yes, many surgical operations were done on the burnt student and he needs more in Plastic surgery. o I do not know that the burnt student was detained but, all I know is the detention of Telal. Some questions of 3rd defendant’s lawyer:   The 3rd defendant and the burnt student were Muslims. The 3rd defendant is friend and classmate of the burnt student’s brother (Jamal) and all of them are IDPs from Kalma and Outash camps in Darfur. According to accusation articles, the 3rd defendant proved hatred, do you have any information that he published even a single article against religion? According to your investigation with the 1st defendant, did he claim that he is representing Czech Republic? The burnt student’s photo is not part of state secrets and the 3rd defendant is not working to any government body? You cited article (53) against the 3rd defendant? The (3rd defendant) met with the 2nd defendant in order to find treatment for the burnt student. Prosecutor’s Response (answer): o Yes, I know that and I do not have any information that he published such an article. o Yes, the first defendant did not claim. Yes, the photo is not one of state’s secrets and the third defendant is not working in any government body. I did not put spying article for him (then he remembered and said yes, I did). At 03:00 pm the 3rd defendant’s lawyer finalized his cross examination and the judge adjourned court to 14th November 2016 for the accusing panel to re cross-examine the defendants’ lawyers. Notes;     The judge rejected some questions e.g. visa questions, tourism, discussing people opinions, Nuba Mountains coordinates and demarcations of Sudan and South Sudan border. The third and fourth defendants order was changed. Many times the defendants’ panel complained about the intervention of other investigators which forced the judge to warn them The prosecutor/ investigator many times gives answers contradict with what he presented before in which the judge asked him to concentrate. Recommendations/ Appeal     HUDO urges the Sudan court to conduct this trial fairly. HUDO urges all the diplomatic missions and embassies to continue attending the court sessions. HUDO calls upon the activists and defendants’ supporters to keep attending the trial. However, the court session entered the stage of approving or rejecting the accusations. HUDO calls on Sudanese media to give more coverage for the court. End For any further information please write to (hudo2009@gmail.com