incidents from areas where they could gain access but not the entire geographic
territory. Different methods of data collection and information gathering were applied.
Information from the field was critically analyzed by a reporting panel at Kampala office.
The panel used analytical methods to sort the information in order to arrive at accurate
findings which were included in this report. For the purposes of consolidating this
report, HUDO Centre also used the following methods in collecting and analyzing data/
information:
1) Data collection forms were developed/ used
2) Victims, their relatives and witnesses were interviewed
3) Documents and comments from professionals (Lawyers, Doctors etc) were
verified
4) Official declarations were scrutinized
1.7
Limitations and challenges
Due to security threats, some of the victims and witnesses do not easily reveal
information
Field monitors’ effort to gather information was and is still hindered by the
general state of insecurity in the conflict areas intensified by the government’s
imposition of state of emergency in the two states.
The keen suspicion from security and intelligence agencies to anybody that talks
about human rights.
The number of monitors is limited in terms of geographic coverage and this
implies that certain incidents happen without being noticed/ reported
The withdraw (quitting) of some monitors which further reduces on number.
Poor means of transport
The general fear by the monitors in case the interviewed victims were subjected
to torture and forced to reveal their (monitor’s) identity.
5
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents