HUDO Centre  Article (20): Penalty of attempt to commit an offense  Article (21): Join acts in execution of criminal conspiracy.  Article (130): Murder.  Article (139): Penalty for causing intentional wounds.  Article (175): Robbery. The cross examination The investigator was cross-examined by the accusation panel represented by lawyer/ Baroud Sandal, the first defendant was represented by lawyer/ Abu-Algasim Mohammed, the sixth and seventh defendants were represented by lawyer/ Yousif and the rest of the defendants were represented by the military’s legal consultant/ Amein. The conclusion was as follows:  The PDF commandant in Al-Abbasiya is Captain/ Ali Babikir and the PDF coordinator is Mohammed Saeed.  The defendants committed the offence on their own without official order  According to the witnesses, the defendants were more than thirty people with more than twenty motorbikes and armed with AK-47 guns. But they denied having any motorbikes.  The killed people were eight (8) in number and the injured were thirteen (13) people. All the injuries and deaths were caused by gun shots.  All the defendants are from the tribes of Meserya and Falata/ Fulani  No one among the attackers/ defendants was injured during the incident.  The defendant Osman was identified by one of the injured people (Ismail Adam Awad) as the one who shot him.  Witnesses recognized some of the defendants in person.  The first defendant (juvenile) is not a member in PDF Notes:  The victims’ family members attended court in large numbers.  The victims’ lawyers questioned the motive of the military in presenting only four (4) guns to court as exhibits while the armed defendants were many. Also, the